Re: [RESEND PATCH v6, 4/5] usb: Add MediaTek USB3 DRD Driver
From: Matthias Brugger <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-11 10:24:03
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, lkml
On 10/11/2016 05:14 AM, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 13:00 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:quoted
On 09/21/2016 07:54 AM, Chunfeng Yun wrote:quoted
This patch adds support for the MediaTek USB3 controller integrated into MT8173. It can be configured as Dual-Role Device (DRD), Peripheral Only and Host Only (xHCI) modes. Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> --- drivers/usb/Kconfig | 2 + drivers/usb/Makefile | 1 + drivers/usb/mtu3/Kconfig | 54 +++ drivers/usb/mtu3/Makefile | 19 + drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3.h | 422 +++++++++++++++++ drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_core.c | 871 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_dr.c | 379 ++++++++++++++++ drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_dr.h | 108 +++++ drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c | 731 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget_ep0.c | 883 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_host.c | 294 ++++++++++++ drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_hw_regs.h | 473 +++++++++++++++++++ drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c | 490 ++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_qmu.c | 599 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_qmu.h | 43 ++ 15 files changed, 5369 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/Kconfig create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/Makefile create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3.h create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_core.c create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_dr.c create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_dr.h create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget_ep0.c create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_host.c create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_hw_regs.h create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_plat.c create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_qmu.c create mode 100644 drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_qmu.hAs Oliver already said, this patch is quiet big which makes it difficult to review. I propose to provide a first implementation with minimal functionality and incremental patches on top of this when the first got merged. You could split the patch in three series/parts: 1. Host only 2. Peripheral only 3. Dual mode What do you think?Ok, I'll split the patch into some small ones as many as possible.
There is no direct policy how to do that and it depends a bit on every maintainer what he prefers. As a rule of thumb each commit should compile on it's own without errors. This makes bisecting the kernel much easier. Regards, Matthias
Thanks a lotquoted
Regards, Matthias
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html