On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 10:32:12AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Maxime Ripard
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The generic pin configuration and multiplexing should be preferred now,
even though we still support the old one.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt
index 69617220c5d6..e8b7cf64fdf1 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt

@@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ pins it needs, and how they should be configured, with regard to muxer
 configuration, drive strength and pullups. If one of these options is
 not set, its actual value will be unspecified.

+This driver supports the generic pin multiplexing and configuration
+bindings.

Should we list which options are supported? We don't support them all.

Yep, I'll add that.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com