On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:09:07AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Chris Brandt [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Signed-off-by: Chris Brandt <redacted>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/r7s72100-rskrza1.dts | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r7s72100-rskrza1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r7s72100-rskrza1.dts
index e5dea5b..548b51f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r7s72100-rskrza1.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r7s72100-rskrza1.dts
@@ -56,6 +56,10 @@
};
};
+&sdhi1 {
+ status = "okay";
On all other boards, we have the bus-width property in the board-specific
.dts instead of in the SoC-specific .dtsi.
I'd like us to be consistent as much as possible.
But I do wonder why it has been added as a board property.
quoted
+};
+
&scif2 {
status = "okay";
};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html