Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] arm64: arch_timer: Work around QorIQ Erratum A-008585
From: Mark Rutland <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-19 16:55:31
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 11:31:45PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 14:07 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
On 12/09/16 13:59, Mark Rutland wrote:quoted
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 01:30:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:quoted
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:44:07PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:quoted
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:36:15PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:quoted
The changes in arm64's <asm/arch_timer.h> are going to conflict with some cleanup [1,2] that just landed in the arm64 for-next/core branch. Could you please rebase atop of that?Well, we should figure out what tree this is going through first. There are a mixture of arm, arm64, driver and dts changes here and not all of it is carrying the appropriate acks for me to queue it.Given that mix, I had assumed that this would all go through the arm64 tree -- I see that Rob has already acked the binding, and I'm happy to give my ack for the driver once that's in shape.Now I see that I'd missed the arch/arm changes in patch 4, which lack a relevant ack. Given that, I don't know what to suggest.I wouldn't mind delaying patch 4 until it gets acked by RMK, as it doesn't impact the functionality.Mark asked me to move that patch before the workaround patch, to avoid ever having to add more code that messes with the name. Should I keep the order as is then?
Yes; at this stage I think we have to. Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html