Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] mfd: mxs-lradc: Add support for mxs-lradc MFD
From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-29 23:12:30
Also in:
linux-iio, linux-input, lkml
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, Stefan Wahren wrote:
Hi Lee, [add Rob and Mark]quoted
Lee Jones [off-list ref] hat am 29. September 2016 um 19:15 geschrieben: On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, Stefan Wahren wrote:quoted
quoted
Lee Jones [off-list ref] hat am 28. September 2016 um 03:05 geschrieben: On Sat, 17 Sep 2016, Ksenija Stanojevic wrote:quoted
+ +static int mxs_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + const struct of_device_id *of_id; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct device_node *node = dev->of_node; + struct mxs_lradc *lradc; + struct mfd_cell *cells = NULL; + int ret = 0; + u32 ts_wires = 0; + + lradc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*lradc), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!lradc) + return -ENOMEM; + + of_id = of_match_device(mxs_lradc_dt_ids, &pdev->dev); + lradc->soc = (enum mxs_lradc_id)of_id->data; + + lradc->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(lradc->clk)) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get the delay unit clock\n"); + return PTR_ERR(lradc->clk); + } + + ret = clk_prepare_enable(lradc->clk); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable the delay unit clock\n"); + return ret; + } + + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires",Have you moved the documentation into devicetree/bindings/mfd?i hope it's okay if i answer. The binding has moved to devicetree/binding/iio/adc/ [1] Should it move completely to mfd or split too? I'm asking myself how we keep DT ABI in the latter case. [1] - http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txtI haven't read into the documentation too to deeply, but it stands to reason that the bindings which are now being used in MFD should be documented in the MFD binding document, and the ones which are no longer used in the IIO driver should be removed.sure, that isn't a problem. The more interesting question would be: do we need a new compatible string for the mfd driver?
No, I don't think that is necessary.
In that case the ADC won't probe for the combination of old devicetree blobs and new kernel.
-- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog