Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2016-09-02

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] regulator: pwm: Add support for a fixed delay after duty cycle changes

From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-01 21:09:49
Also in: linux-rockchip, lkml

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 09:21:15PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
A change of the duty cycle doesn't necessarily cause an immediate switch
to the target voltage.  On many PWM regulators there is a fixed "settle
time" (irrespective of the jump size) that we need to wait after an
upward jump.  This change introduces the device tree property
"settle-time-up-us" which allows us to specify a fixed delay after a
voltage increase.
Why is this specific to regulators implemented with PWM controllers?
Most DCDCs have a PWM element and the concept of a hard time limit for
transition rather than a ramp rate doesn't seem like it'd be unique.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help