Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] regulator: pwm: Add support for a fixed delay after duty cycle changes
From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-01 21:09:49
Also in:
linux-rockchip, lkml
From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-01 21:09:49
Also in:
linux-rockchip, lkml
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 09:21:15PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
A change of the duty cycle doesn't necessarily cause an immediate switch to the target voltage. On many PWM regulators there is a fixed "settle time" (irrespective of the jump size) that we need to wait after an upward jump. This change introduces the device tree property "settle-time-up-us" which allows us to specify a fixed delay after a voltage increase.
Why is this specific to regulators implemented with PWM controllers? Most DCDCs have a PWM element and the concept of a hard time limit for transition rather than a ramp rate doesn't seem like it'd be unique.