Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree

On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Mark Brown wrote:

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 03:50:18PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Mark Brown wrote:

quoted

quoted

You acked it, that's saying that you're OK with the patch and are
expecting someone else to apply it.

quoted

No it doesn't, you made that up. :)

quoted

I know when you and some others Ack a patch, that's what you mean, but

That's the standard meaning I'm afraid, you're going to confuse people
if you do that.  I'd suggest using a different tag if you want to do
this, probably make one up.

Reviewed-by-BUT-DONT-TAKE-IT-YOU-FIEND: <me>

:)

Temporary-Acked-by-[to go through MFD tree]: <me>

Suggestions?

quoted

you've been working with me for long enough to know that's not what I
mean when I Ack a patch.  I do it as an indication that I've reviewed
the patch and I'm happy with it.  Most MFD patches that have

Sorry but I'm not actually reading most of these threads, I've not seen
this behaviour.  Mostly I just look at the relevant patches, especially
on the resends where presumably this has been happening.  Not sure why I
even saw the ack here, perhaps I had some question about the versioning
API.  

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html