Re: [PATCH] [v7] net: emac: emac gigabit ethernet controller driver
From: Timur Tabi <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-09 19:34:00
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, netdev
Timur Tabi wrote:
I used to work on PowerPC, so I respect making things work for both endians. However, even I think that this is overkill for my driver. First, there's no way this driver will ever be used on a big-endian system. Second, I'm pretty sure there are lots of places that would need cpu_to_le32() in order to make this driver big-endian compatible. It would be a huge mess. #define TPD_BUFFER_ADDR_H_SET(tpd, val) BITS_SET((tpd)->word[3], 18, 30, val) This macros sets specific bits based on the definition of the register. I could change it to this: #define TPD_BUFFER_ADDR_H_SET(tpd, val) BITS_SET((tpd)->word[3], 18, 30, cpu_to_le32(val)) But I honestly don't see what good that will do. There are still thousands of other places that assume little-endian.
Ok, so I took another look at this, and even though I still think that it's useless, it seems to be much less difficult to implement than I initially thought. I think all I need to do is to modify the BITS_GET() and BITS_SET() macros in emac-mac.h, as well as any of the RRD_xxx and TPD_xxx macros that do not use BITS_GET() or BITS_SET(). This is a minor change which I will implement in v8 of the patch. Every other hardware access uses readl/writel, which is already endian-safe. -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html