On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Rob Herring wrote:

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to
be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem.  Where
we used to treat each line as a channel, the PWM convention is to
describe them as devices.

This is out of date now. Otherwise, the binding looks fine.

Yes, you are right.

Perhaps if this is okay with Thierry, he can remove these few lines.
If not, I don't mind re-sending on request.

I'll leave it until I hear otherwise.

quoted

The second documentation adaption entails adding support for PWM
capture devices.  A new clock is required as well as an IRQ line.
We're also adding a new property similar to the one described
above, but for capture channels.  Typically, there will be less
capture channels than PWM-out, since all channels have the latter
capability, but only some have capture support.

Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-st.txt | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog