On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 07:56:24AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
index 1992aa9..fbad2cea 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
@@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ ste ST-Ericsson
stericsson ST-Ericsson
syna Synaptics Inc.
synology Synology, Inc.
+sunchip Shenzhen Sunchip Technology Co., Ltd
SUNW Sun Microsystems, Inc
These are not in alphabetical order. Maybe someone thought uppercase
should be separate, but I don't. So please fix the ordering here moving
SUNW before syna.
I'm new to this, so I could use a bit of guidance here. Is it OK if I
send a follow-up patch to fix the ordering or should I send a patch to
fix the ordering first, before the sunchip prefix is added?
I never considered the possibility that the list wouldn't be in
alphabetical order to begin with, so the brain power went into deciding
if uppercase should be sorted separately.
--
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
Danish law requires addresses in e-mail to be logged and stored for a year