Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement of_xlate() for SMMUv3
From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-01 12:35:08
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-iommu
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 04:48:26PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
Now that we can properly describe the mapping between PCI RIDs and stream IDs via "iommu-map", and have it fed it to the driver automatically via of_xlate(), rework the SMMUv3 driver to benefit from that, and get rid of the current misuse of the "iommus" binding. Since having of_xlate wired up means that masters will now be given the appropriate DMA ops, we also need to make sure that default domains work properly. This necessitates dispensing with the "whole group at a time" notion for attaching to a domain, as devices which share a group get attached to the group's default domain one by one as they are initially probed. Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <redacted> ---
[...]
static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
{
int i, ret;
- u32 sid, *sids;
- struct pci_dev *pdev;
- struct iommu_group *group;
- struct arm_smmu_group *smmu_group;
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
+ struct arm_smmu_master_data *master;
+ struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec(dev);
+ struct iommu_group *group;
- /* We only support PCI, for now */
- if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
+ if (!fwspec || fwspec->iommu_ops != &arm_smmu_ops)
return -ENODEV;
-
- pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
- group = iommu_group_get_for_dev(dev);
- if (IS_ERR(group))
- return PTR_ERR(group);
-
- smmu_group = iommu_group_get_iommudata(group);
- if (!smmu_group) {
- smmu = arm_smmu_get_for_pci_dev(pdev);
- if (!smmu) {
- ret = -ENOENT;
- goto out_remove_dev;
- }
-
- smmu_group = kzalloc(sizeof(*smmu_group), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!smmu_group) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto out_remove_dev;
- }
-
- smmu_group->ste.valid = true;
- smmu_group->smmu = smmu;
- iommu_group_set_iommudata(group, smmu_group,
- __arm_smmu_release_pci_iommudata);
+ /*
+ * We _can_ actually withstand dodgy bus code re-calling add_device()
+ * without an intervening remove_device()/of_xlate() sequence, but
+ * we're not going to do so quietly...
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(fwspec->iommu_priv)) {
+ master = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+ smmu = master->smmu;
} else {
- smmu = smmu_group->smmu;
+ smmu = arm_smmu_get_by_node(fwspec->iommu_np);
+ if (!smmu)
+ return -ENODEV;
+ master = kzalloc(sizeof(*master), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!master)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ master->smmu = smmu;
+ fwspec->iommu_priv = master;
}
- /* Assume SID == RID until firmware tells us otherwise */
- pci_for_each_dma_alias(pdev, __arm_smmu_get_pci_sid, &sid);
- for (i = 0; i < smmu_group->num_sids; ++i) {
- /* If we already know about this SID, then we're done */
- if (smmu_group->sids[i] == sid)
- goto out_put_group;
+ /* Check the SIDs are in range of the SMMU and our stream table */
+ for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++) {
+ u32 sid = fwspec->ids[i];
+
+ if (!arm_smmu_sid_in_range(smmu, sid))
+ return -ERANGE;
+
+ /* Ensure l2 strtab is initialised */
+ if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_STRTAB) {
+ ret = arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(smmu, sid);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
}Do you not need to do some cleanup here, rather than just returning (same for the -ERANGE above)? For example, freeing the master? Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html