Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver
From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Date: 2016-07-28 20:00:54
Also in:
linux-sh, lkml
From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Date: 2016-07-28 20:00:54
Also in:
linux-sh, lkml
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 04:44:05PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
quoted
+static int jcore_pit_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self, + unsigned long action, void *hcpu) +{ + struct jcore_pit_nb *nb = container_of(self, struct jcore_pit_nb, nb); + switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) { + case CPU_STARTING: + jcore_pit_local_init(this_cpu_ptr(nb->pit_percpu)); + break; + } + return NOTIFY_OK;Please convert this to the new state machine model of cpu hotplug. CPU_STARTING will be gone very soon. Here is an example: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?h=smp/hotplug&id=7e86e8bd8dd67649d176e08d8dfb90039f0a1e98
Trying this change now and I'm getting hangs inside cpuhp_invoke_ap_callback between wake_up_process and wait_for_completion. I suspect it's not possible to run a scheduled task yet because there's no timer yet, or something like that. Do I need further infrastructure from tip that's not upstream yet in order to test this? I just rebased on linus/master and still have the same problem, but none of the other driver changes are in Linus's tree yet. Following the other drivers in tip (again, I don't have any of these in my tree), I put the new state between CPUHP_AP_SCHED_STARTING and CPUHP_AP_NOTIFY_STARTING; is this correct? Rich