Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701

Hi CK,

On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 14:53 +0800, CK Hu wrote:

Hi, YT:

Some comments inline.

On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 18:07 +0800, YT Shen wrote:

quoted

This patch add support for the Mediatek MT2701 DISP subsystem.
There is only one OVL engine in MT2701.

Signed-off-by: YT Shen <yt.shen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c     |    6 ++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c    |    6 ++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c      |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c |    7 +++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.h |    1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c      |   31 ++++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 92 insertions(+)

[snip...]

quoted

 
 static const struct of_device_id mtk_ddp_comp_dt_ids[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-ovl",   .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OVL },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-ovl",   .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OVL },
+	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-rdma",  .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_RDMA },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-rdma",  .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_RDMA },
+	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-wdma",  .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_WDMA },

Is WDMA different from MT8173 to MT2701. If they are the same, you need
not to add compatible of 'mediatek,mt2701-disp-wdma' because use
'mediatek,mt8173-disp-wdma' is enough.

Yes, the hardware has differences, so we need add new compatible
'mt2701-disp-wdma'

quoted

 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-wdma",  .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_WDMA },
+	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-color", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_COLOR },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-color", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_COLOR },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-aal",   .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_AAL},
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-gamma", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_GAMMA, },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-ufoe",  .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_UFOE },
+	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-dsi",	      .data = (void *)MTK_DSI },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dsi",        .data = (void *)MTK_DSI },
+	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-dpi",	      .data = (void *)MTK_DPI },

Is DPI different from MT8173 to MT2701. If they are the same, you need
not to add compatible of 'mediatek,mt2701-dpi' because use
'mediatek,mt8173-dpi' is enough.

Yes, the hardware has differences, so we need add new compatible
'mt2701-dpi'

quoted

 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dpi",        .data = (void *)MTK_DPI },
+	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-mutex", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_MUTEX },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-mutex", .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_MUTEX },
+	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-pwm",   .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_PWM },

Is pwm different from MT8173 to MT2701. If they are the same, you need
not to add compatible of 'mediatek,mt2701-disp-pwm' because use
'mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm' is enough.

Yes, the hardware has differences, so we need add new compatible
'mt2701-disp-pwm'

Regards,
yt.shen

quoted

 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm",   .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_PWM },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-od",    .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OD },
 	{ }

@@ -514,6 +543,8 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mtk_drm_pm_ops, mtk_drm_sys_suspend,
 			 mtk_drm_sys_resume);
 
 static const struct of_device_id mtk_drm_of_ids[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-mmsys",
+	  .data = &mt2701_mmsys_driver_data},
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-mmsys",
 	  .data = &mt8173_mmsys_driver_data},
 	{ }

Regards,
CK