On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 07:10:54AM -0700, Thomas Kaiser wrote:

Hi,

Ondřej Jirman wrote:

quoted

We have boards that have 1.1/1.3V switching, only 1.3V, fine tuned 
voltage regulation and every such board will need it's own set of 
operating points. 

Yes, and Allwinner's current BSP kernel code might encourage board makers 
to implement a forth variant: switching between 4 different voltages 
through GPIOs.

Currently we have 4 boards that rely on the simple '2 voltage regulation' 
all using 1.1V/1.3V: Orange Pi One and Lite and NanoPi M1 and NEO. Then 
there are 2 devices with (legacy) Linux support existing that use no 
voltage regulation at all: Banana Pi M2+ (according to schematic using 1.2V 
but in reality it's 1.3V VDD_CPUX) and Beelink X2. And according to Tsvetan 
if/when Olimex will release their 2 H3 boards we have two more with fixed 
but yet unknown VDD_CPUX voltage (since olimex fears overheating maybe they 
use 1.1V or 1.2V limiting max cpufreq to 816 or 1008 MHz). And all the 
bigger H3 based Orange Pi use the SY8106A voltage regulator being able to 
adjust VDD_CPUX in steps of 20mV allowing VDD_CPUX to exceed 1200 MHz (a 
reasonable value seems to be 1296 MHz since above throttling will be an 
issue without active cooling)

Ok, good to know. I'm not sure overclocking is ever a reasonable
solution, but that's a separate topic.

Things get even worse since Xunlong uses copper layers inside the PCB to 
spread the heat away from H3 so Orange Pi One/Lite do not overheat that 
much like eg. NanoPi M1 (and maybe NEO -- can tell next week when I get dev 
samples to play with). So while eg. Orange Pi One and NanoPi M1 switch 
between the same voltages in the same way we (Armbian) found that we have 
to allow M1 to downclock to even 240 MHz since when testing with legacy 
kernel really heavy workloads led to throttling that low (even CPU cores 
were killed at this low clockspeed -- same applies to BPi M2+ and Beelink 
X2)

And that's what I really want to avoid. Even though that board
absolutely requires the 240MHz OPP to run properly, nothing prevents
from using that OPP on other boards as well, that will also benefit
from it. Thermal throttling is something that needs to be handled, but
power management is also something we should consider, and I see no
reason why not to have a consistent set of operating frequencies, even
though the voltage might differ depending on the regulator
capabilities.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.