Hi,

Am 22.07.2016 um 08:36 schrieb Jacek Anaszewski [off-list ref]:

On 07/20/2016 03:24 AM, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:47:31PM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:

quoted

Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <redacted>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/leds/is31fl319x.txt        | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/is31fl319x.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/is31fl319x.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/is31fl319x.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..03287c0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/is31fl319x.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+LEDs connected to is31fl319x LED controller chip
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible : Should be any of
+	"issi,is31fl3190"
+	"issi,is31fl3191"
+	"issi,is31fl3193"
+	"issi,is31fl3196"
+	"issi,is31fl3199"
+	"si-en,sn3199".
+- #address-cells: Must be 1.
+- #size-cells: Must be 0.
+- reg: 0x64, 0x65, 0x66, 0x67.

This is an OR or AND? OR it seems. With that,

Nikolaus, could you please make it explicit?

Yes, Rob's intuition is right. An AND does
obviously not make sense for a reg property.

It is an OR.

So if you perfer, please substitute 

- reg: 0x64, 0x65, 0x66, or 0x67.

BR,
Nikolaus