On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:26:43AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Le 26/06/2016 01:05, Maxime Ripard a écrit :
quoted
Hi Florian,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 07:59:23PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
quoted
Le 23/06/2016 22:48, Chen-Yu Tsai a écrit :
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-lamobo-r1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-lamobo-r1.dts
index 5ee43d8bf174..697582397dcf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-lamobo-r1.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-lamobo-r1.dts
@@ -110,13 +110,67 @@
&gmac {
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&gmac_pins_rgmii_a>;
- phy = <&phy1>;
phy-mode = "rgmii";
phy-supply = <®_gmac_3v3>;
status = "okay";
- phy1: ethernet-phy@1 {
- reg = <1>;
+ fixed-link {
+ speed = <1000>;
+ full-duplex;
+ };
+
+ mdio1 {
mdio will suffice.
There is another label in sun7i-a20.dtsi named mdio which is for the
MDIO controller node matching allwinner,sun4i-a10-mdio, which is not the
one we want here, we want the MDIO controller associated with the
Synopsys GMAC.
Yes, but it's in a different node, and you're not using any labels, so
I don't really see how that would conflict.
Fair enough, I sent a v2 which uses "mdio-gmac" as a label, should I
respin a v3 which just uses "mdio"?
Yes, please do, thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com