Re: [PATCH 1/2] ubi: mount partitions specified in device tree
From: Daniel Golle <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-19 21:52:25
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:36:19PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 06/19/2016 01:56 AM, Daniel Golle wrote:quoted
Hi! I got some remarks here: On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 09:17:55PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:quoted
This makes it possible to open a ubi layer in device tree, this is helpful when the rootfs is on a ubi layer. It loops though all mtd partitions and mounts the partition which is compatible with "ubi,volume". The same was only possible with kernel command line arguments before.Strictly speaking this doesn't describe what this change does. Rather than mounting anything you are creating ubiblock devices... More comments in-line.quoted
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke-5/S+JYg5SzeELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ubi.txt | 33 ++++++++++++++ drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ubi.txtdiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ubi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ubi.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5fcd47e --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ubi.txt@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +UBI - Unsorted block images + +Describe of a UBI layer in device tree. + + - compatible: "ubi,device", This marks a partition that contains + a ubi layer. + - vid_hdr_offs: Optional parameter specifies UBI VID header position + to be used by UBI. (default value if 0) + - max_beb_per1024: Optional parameter specifies the maximum expected bad + eraseblock per 1024 eraseblocks. + (default value CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT) + -ubi_num: Optional parameter specifies UBI device number + which have to be assigned to the newly created UBI + device (assigned automatically by default) + +Example: + +partitions { + compatible = "fixed-partitions"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + + partition@0 { + label = "uboot"; + reg = <0x00000 0x100000>; + }; + + partition@1c0000 { + label = "system_sw"; + reg = <0x1c0000 0xc800000>; + compatible = "ubi,device"; + }; +};Similar to the other patch, the example in the documentation is swapped and doesn't match with the code added by the patch.quoted
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c index ebf46ad..5ed390d 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.cWait a moment: What about ubifs being the root filesystem? That doesn't need a ubiblock device to be created...Should I write an error message and do nothing when this is a ubifs partition?
Just do nothing if you find a UBIFS magic. I reckon there shouldn't be any error message because it's not an error but rather just another valid case. Maybe an info message could be useful for starters...
quoted
quoted
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ /* * Copyright (c) 2014 Ezequiel Garcia * Copyright (c) 2011 Free Electrons + * Copyright (c) 2016 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke-5/S+JYg5SzeELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> * * Driver parameter handling strongly based on drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c * Copyright (c) International Business Machines Corp., 2006@@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/list.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/of.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/mtd/ubi.h> #include <linux/workqueue.h>@@ -628,6 +630,64 @@ static void __init ubiblock_create_from_param(void) } } +static void __init ubiblock_create_from_device_tree(void) +{ + int ubi_num; + const char *name; + u32 mode; + struct ubi_device *ubi; + struct ubi_volume_desc *desc; + struct ubi_volume_info vi; + struct mtd_info *mtd; + struct device_node *volume; + int ret; + + for (ubi_num = 0; ubi_num < UBI_MAX_DEVICES; ubi_num++) { + ubi = ubi_get_device(ubi_num); + if (!ubi) + continue; + mtd = ubi->mtd; + if (!mtd || !of_device_is_compatible(mtd->dev.of_node, + "ubi,device")) { + ubi_put_device(ubi); + continue; + } + + for_each_child_of_node(mtd->dev.of_node, volume) { + if (!of_device_is_compatible(volume, "ubi,volume")) + continue; + + ret = of_property_read_string(volume, "name", &name); + if (ret) + continue; + + ret = of_property_read_u32(volume, "ubi-mode", &mode); + if (ret) + continue; + + desc = ubi_open_volume_nm(ubi_num, name, mode); + if (IS_ERR(desc)) { + pr_err( + "UBI: block: can't open volume %s on ubi%d, err=%ld", + name, ubi_num, PTR_ERR(desc)); + continue; + } + + ubi_get_volume_info(desc, &vi); + ubi_close_volume(desc); + + ret = ubiblock_create(&vi); + if (ret) { + pr_err( + "UBI: block: can't add '%s' volume on ubi%d, err=%d", + vi.name, ubi_num, ret); + continue; + } + } + ubi_put_device(ubi); + } +} + static void ubiblock_remove_all(void) { struct ubiblock *next;@@ -658,6 +718,9 @@ int __init ubiblock_init(void) */ ubiblock_create_from_param(); + /* Attach block devices from device tree */ + ubiblock_create_from_device_tree(); +Probably you also want to set ROOT_DEV similar to what we currently do in https://git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=blob;f=target/linux/generic/patches-4.4/493-ubi-set-ROOT_DEV-to-ubiblock-rootfs-if-unset.patchquoted
/* * Block devices are only created upon user requests, so we ignore * existing volumes. -- 2.8.1 ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html