Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: imx6q-cm-fx6: fix the operation points
From: Christopher Spinrath <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-12 14:05:11
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel
Hi Fabio, thanks for your review! On 06/12/2016 03:43 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Christopher, On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 10:20 AM, [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Valentin Raevsky <valentin-UTxiZqZC01RS1MOuV/RT9w@public.gmane.org> Fix the cm-fx6 operation points. Remove settings for 1.2GHz. The current ldo settings do not allow 1.2GHz cpu frequency. Signed-off-by: Valentin Raevsky <valentin-UTxiZqZC01RS1MOuV/RT9w@public.gmane.org> [christopher.spinrath-vA1bhqPz9FBZXbeN9DUtxg@public.gmane.org: rebased on upstream and adapted commit title] Signed-off-by: Christopher Spinrath <redacted> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts index 6d8d5e9..c912d58 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts@@ -91,6 +91,23 @@ }; }; +&cpu0 { + operating-points = < + /* kHz uV */ + 996000 1250000 + 852000 1250000 + 792000 1150000 + 396000 975000 + >; + fsl,soc-operating-points = < + /* ARM kHz SOC-PU uV */ + 996000 1250000 + 852000 1250000 + 792000 1175000 + 396000 1175000 + >;These operating points do not match the ones from imx6q.dtsi.
Indeed, the voltage for 792000kHz is not the same. Thanks for pointing that out.
In order to avoid 1.2GHz operation we have imx6q_opp_check_speed_grading() inside arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c. This function checks if the mx6q is capable of running at 1.2GHz or not, depending on the fuse reading and then it will skip the 1.2GHz operating point if it detects it can't run at such frequency. These operating points are defined at the SoC dtsi and we don't have any board dts that define them locally like this patch proposes, so I recommend we keep using the operating points from imx6q.dtsi.
Well, without this patch the SoC runs at 1.2GHz so it seems like the fuse indicates that it is possible. But with a fair amount of IPs enabled and high load the board becomes unstable (display flickering/blanks, ethernet package drops, ...). I guess CompuLab allowed 1.2GHz at first and then realized that it is a bad idea (at least for some boards). Is there any way to influence the fuse (e.g. from the firmware/bootloader) or do you have another proposal on how to fix this issue? Cheers, Christopher -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html