Hi,

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Heiko Stuebner [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

It looks like there are also more power domains that you haven't
listed here (like PD_GMAC, for instance, or PD_CORE_L).  Are you
planning to add those in a followon patch?

that reminds me, nodes with a reg property should have the base address in
the node name as well. Using the constant works nicely, as can be seen on
the rk3288 where we have for example:

        pd_vio@RK3288_PD_VIO

I was wondering about that.  The device tree bindings are similarly
missing the reg from the example.

I'm curious: for sorting purposes, are you supposed to know the
underlying integer and use that for sorting, or sort by the name of
the #define?

-Doug