Re: [PATCH v9 2/4] power: reset: add reboot mode driver
From: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
Date: 2016-06-21 06:25:35
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
Hi Paul: On 2016年06月20日 22:40, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[Re: [PATCH v9 2/4] power: reset: add reboot mode driver] On 20/06/2016 (Mon 14:31) Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:quoted
On 06/20/2016 10:28 AM, Andy Yan wrote:quoted
Hi Krzysztof: On 2016年06月20日 16:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:quoted
On 06/20/2016 08:38 AM, Andy Yan wrote:[...]quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ +config SYSCON_REBOOT_MODE + bool "Generic SYSCON regmap reboot mode driver"Why not tristate?I see many reset drivers in this directories use bool, so I follow them.Andy - understood, but mistakes done in the past do not justify repeating them again in the present. OK, this is not strictly a mistake in that it causes an error, but it isn't an ideal approach.quoted
+Cc Paul, I don't mind that although I don't see any particular objections for making it module-capable. In the same time I just reminded myself about Paul Gortmaker's long effort (like [1] [2]) about removing module capability from non-modular drivers.Thanks -- it is nice to see that people are starting to add this to their review checklist ; early on they were getting added faster than I could remove them. :-( But I think we are making ground now. For this case, I don't have any bias for it being built-in vs. being modular, so long as the code is actually consistent with the Kconfig. For existing bool settings I just remove the modular references, since I can't be extending the functionality to include a modular usage when I can't test it or even be sure if a module has a sensible use case. Paul. --
I will remove the module related stuff in the next version.
quoted
Following his rationale, I think either this should be a tristate or the module stuff should be removed. Best regards, Krzysztof [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/21/180 [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/13/682