Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] max8903: cleans up confusing relationship between dc_valid, dok and dcm.
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-17 06:23:40
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-17 06:23:40
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On 06/17/2016 07:00 AM, Chris Lapa wrote:
From: Chris Lapa <redacted> The max8903_charger.h file indicated that dcm and dok were not optional when dc_valid is set. It makes sense to have dok as a compulsory pin when dc_valid is given. However dcm can be optionally wired to a fixed level especially when the circuit is configured for dc power exclusively. The previous implementation already allowed for this somewhat, however no error was given if dok wasn't given whilst dc_valid was. The new implementation enforces dok presence when dc_valid is given. Whilst allowing dcm to be optional. Signed-off-by: Chris Lapa <redacted> --- drivers/power/max8903_charger.c | 23 ++++++++++------------- include/linux/power/max8903_charger.h | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Code looks correct: Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <redacted> Best regards, Krzysztof