Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-03-18

Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: juno/vexpress: fix node name unit-address presence warnings

From: Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-18 10:32:16
Also in: linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 16:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Sudeep Holla [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Commit fa38a82096a1 ("scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version
53bf130b1cdd") added warnings on node name unit-address presence/absence
mismatch in device trees.

This patch fixes those warning on all the juno/vexpress platforms where
unit-address is present in node name while the reg/ranges property is
not present.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dtsi         |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-base.dtsi             | 14 +++++-----
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-motherboard.dtsi      | 30 +++++++++++-----------
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dts         |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/rtsm_ve-motherboard.dtsi   | 14 +++++-----
 .../boot/dts/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7-ca53x2.dts      | 10 ++++----
 6 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

Hi Rob,

I am not sure if the intention of commit fa38a82096a1 is to fix even
existing warnings or not. I saw warning with today's -next branch.
Yes. I'm dropping it for 4.6 though.
quoted
Let me know.

Regards,
Sudeep
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dtsi
index 9314f3943269..ba03c934a861 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dtsi
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
                             <0 63 4>;
        };

-       smb {
+       smb@0,08000000 {
Drop the comma and leading zeros. Comma is for distinct fields like
bus,dev,func on PCI.
So what is the correct way of representing 2 cell addresses? Not just
those that are logically 64-bit addresses, (which I guess could be just
a single number), but things like vexpress motherboard where we have
Chip-select and Offset values?

I looked at ePAPR but it just says 'The unit-address must
match the first address specified in the reg property of the node.' and
lists valid characters for unit address, which includes ,._+-

-- 
Tixy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help