Hi Sergei,

On 3/1/2016 1:04 PM, Ramesh Shanmugasundaram wrote:

quoted

Adds CAN FD controller node for r8a7795.

Note: CAN FD controller register base address specified in R-Car Gen3
Hardware User Manual v0.5E is incorrect. The correct address is:

CAN FD - 0xe66c0000

Signed-off-by: Ramesh Shanmugasundaram
[off-list ref]
---
Hi All,

    This patch is based on linux-next (tag:next-20160225) with the

following

quoted

    patches applied on top.

    [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add CAN external clock support
    [PATCH] arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add CAN support

    The respective CAN subsystem changes are submitted separately here
(https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg013
88.html)

Thanks,
Ramesh
---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi

b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
index a88f8d8..5049ba6 100644

--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi

@@ -553,6 +553,30 @@
  			status = "disabled";
  		};

+		canfd: canfd@e66c0000 {

    The node name should still be "can@e66c0000", I think.

Thanks for the review.

The SoC has CAN controller too and hence I chose this node name to differentiate. A grep of canfd on sysfs would tell if the controller is enabled. The channels on "net" would still be named "canx".

I'll change it if you still feel "can@e66c0000" is more appropriate.

Thanks,
Ramesh