Thread (74 messages) 74 messages, 10 authors, 2016-04-19

Re: [PATCH 14/15] dt-bindings: arm-gic: Drop 'clock-names' from binding document

From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Date: 2016-03-18 08:37:30
Also in: linux-omap, linux-tegra, lkml

On 17/03/16 20:14, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Jon Hunter [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Commit afbbd2338176 ("irqchip/gic: Document optional Clock and Power
Domain properties") documented optional clock and power-dmoain properties
for the ARM GIC. Currently, there are no users of these and for the
Tegra210 Audio GIC (based upon the GIC-400) there are two clocks, a
functional clock and interface clock, that need to be enabled.

To allow flexibility, drop the 'clock-names' from the GIC binding and
just provide a list of clocks which the driver can parse. It is assumed
that any clocks that are listed, need to be enabled in order to access
the GIC.

Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

---

Please note that I am not sure if this will be popular, but I am trying
to come up with a generic way to handle multiple clocks that may be
required for accessing a GIC.
It's not. :)

We need to specify the number and order of clocks by compatible string
at a minimum. Sadly, ARM's GICs are well documented and include clock
names, so you can't just make up genericish names either which is
probably often the case.
Do you have any suggestions then?

I have had a look at the ARM TRMs and although I see that they do show
the functional clock, there is no mention of whether there are any other
clocks need in order to interface to the GIC (ie. bus clock). I know
that for other SoCs such as OMAP it is common to have both a functional
clock and interface clock. So I believe this is fairly common.

Cheers
Jon
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help