Re: [PATCH 14/15] dt-bindings: arm-gic: Drop 'clock-names' from binding document
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Date: 2016-03-18 08:37:30
Also in:
linux-omap, linux-tegra, lkml
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Date: 2016-03-18 08:37:30
Also in:
linux-omap, linux-tegra, lkml
On 17/03/16 20:14, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Jon Hunter [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Commit afbbd2338176 ("irqchip/gic: Document optional Clock and Power Domain properties") documented optional clock and power-dmoain properties for the ARM GIC. Currently, there are no users of these and for the Tegra210 Audio GIC (based upon the GIC-400) there are two clocks, a functional clock and interface clock, that need to be enabled. To allow flexibility, drop the 'clock-names' from the GIC binding and just provide a list of clocks which the driver can parse. It is assumed that any clocks that are listed, need to be enabled in order to access the GIC. Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> --- Please note that I am not sure if this will be popular, but I am trying to come up with a generic way to handle multiple clocks that may be required for accessing a GIC.It's not. :) We need to specify the number and order of clocks by compatible string at a minimum. Sadly, ARM's GICs are well documented and include clock names, so you can't just make up genericish names either which is probably often the case.
Do you have any suggestions then? I have had a look at the ARM TRMs and although I see that they do show the functional clock, there is no mention of whether there are any other clocks need in order to interface to the GIC (ie. bus clock). I know that for other SoCs such as OMAP it is common to have both a functional clock and interface clock. So I believe this is fairly common. Cheers Jon