On 3/11/2016 11:32 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

memcpy(lldev->tre_ring + lldev->tre_write_offset, &tre->tre_local[0],

quoted

quoted

quoted

+	       TRE_SIZE);

This one

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

+	lldev->tx_status_list[tre->idx].err_code = 0;
+	lldev->tx_status_list[tre->idx].err_info = 0;
+	tre->queued = 1;
+	lldev->pending_tre_count++;

Is this the only one without alignment? I couldn't understand what you mean by 
above one?

quoting Coding Style:

Statements longer than 80 columns will be broken into sensible chunks, unless
exceeding 80 columns significantly increases readability and does not hide
information. 

"Descendants are always substantially shorter than the parent and
are placed substantially to the right."

Sorry for my poor English. I never got this rule. 

Which one is a "substantially" right? Can you give me an example?

I need to understand how you'd write this to satisfy the above rule.

like this:

memcpy(lldev->tre_ring + lldev->tre_write_offset, &tre->tre_local[0],
       TRE_SIZE);

or

memcpy(lldev->tre_ring + lldev->tre_write_offset,
       &tre->tre_local[0], TRE_SIZE);

or

memcpy(lldev->tre_ring + lldev->tre_write_offset, &tre->tre_local[0],
							   TRE_SIZE);

or

memcpy(lldev->tre_ring + lldev->tre_write_offset,
	&tre->tre_local[0], 
	TRE_SIZE);

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project