Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 5 authors, 2016-03-08

Re: [PATCH 1/3] thermal: exynos: List vtmu-supply as optional property in DT binding

From: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-03-08 21:52:05
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:30:17PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Eduardo,

On 03/08/2016 06:07 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 03:19:09PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
quoted
The Exynos Thermal Management Unit binding says that the vtmu-supply
is optional but is listed in the required properties section. Add an
optional properties section and move the regulator property there.

Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <redacted>
---

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
index faa62059b5c5..70b4c16c7ed8 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
@@ -41,9 +41,6 @@
 		for current TMU channel
 	-- "tmu_sclk" clock for functional operation of the current TMU
 		channel
-- vtmu-supply: This entry is optional and provides the regulator node supplying
-		voltage to TMU. If needed this entry can be placed inside
-		board/platform specific dts file.
 
 The Exynos TMU supports generating interrupts when reaching given
 temperature thresholds. Number of supported thermal trip points depends
Where is this patch based on? I checked it on my fixes and linus
branches, also on linux-next 0308 branch, and none of those apply clean.
I mentioned in the cover letter [0] that this series were based on top
of in-flight patches from Krzysztof Kozlowski to avoid merge conflicts.

Those have not landed yet either so maybe you could look at those first?
 
quoted
Can you please send this based on upstream kernel?
Ok, my intention was to make picking both patch series easier but if
this is inconvenient to you, I can base on top of current mainline
and let you handle the merge conflicts (or ask Krzysztof to resend
on top of my patches).

[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/18/591
Got it. I am checking his patches first then.
 
Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help