Re: [PATCH v10 6/6] add TC G210 pci driver
From: Arnd Bergmann <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-04 21:18:08
Also in:
linux-scsi, lkml
On Friday 04 March 2016 17:22:19 Joao Pinto wrote:
This patch adds a glue pci driver for the Synopsys G210 Test Chip. Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto-HKixBCOQz3hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Mostly ok, just a few suggestions:
+ +/* Test Chip type expected values */ +#define TC_G210_20BIT 20 +#define TC_G210_40BIT 40 +#define TC_G210_DEFAULTBIT 40 + +static int tc_type = TC_G210_DEFAULTBIT; +module_param(tc_type, int, 0); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(tc_type, "Test Chip Type (20 = 20-bit, 40 = 40-bit)");
What is the effect of setting the wrong one here? I was thinking it would be best to have the default be 'invalid' and then return an error from the probe() function when you neither value is set.
+
+ /* Check Test Chip type and set the specific setup routine */
+ if (tc_type == TC_G210_20BIT) {
+ tc_dwc_g210_pci_hba_vops.custom_phy_initialization =
+ tc_dwc_g210_config_20_bit;
+ } else if (tc_type == TC_G210_40BIT) {
+ tc_dwc_g210_pci_hba_vops.custom_phy_initialization =
+ tc_dwc_g210_config_40_bit;
+ }As for the platform driver, I would define two separate structures here, and then mark the operations as 'const'.
+static const struct pci_device_id tc_dwc_g210_pci_tbl[] = {
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_SYNOPSYS, 0xB101, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0 },
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_SYNOPSYS, 0xB102, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0 },
+ { } /* terminate list */
+};Is there any difference between these two IDs? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html