Re: [PATCH 14/17] arm: boot: dts: Add PLX Technology OX810SE dtsi
From: Neil Armstrong <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-03 13:39:18
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On 03/03/2016 01:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 03 March 2016 12:40:07 Neil Armstrong wrote:quoted
+ + aliases { + serial0 = &uart0; + serial1 = &uart1; + serial2 = &uart2; + serial3 = &uart3; + gpio0 = &gpio0; + gpio1 = &gpio1; + };Please put the aliases in the per-board file and list only the devices that are actually connected (in case of uart)
Done.
quoted
+ uart0: uart@200000 {Make this serial@200000, to follow the standard naming convention
Done.
quoted
+ + reset: reset-controller { + compatible = "plxtech,nas782x-reset"; + #reset-cells = <1>; + }; + + stdclk: stdclk { + compatible = "plxtech,ox810se-stdclk", "plxtech,nas782x-stdclk"; + #clock-cells = <1>; + }; + };Please change the compatible strings to have no 'x' wildcards in them, but instead use a specific model.
Ok, I switched to only oxsemi,ox810se-* strings.
Regarding the vendor prefixes, my understanding is that "ox810se" was the name of the chip from Oxford Semiconductor, while nas7820 is a product name from PLX. I think it would be logical to use "oxford" as the vendor prefix for anything with a ox810se or ox820 ID in it rather than plxtech.
Ok, I switched to oxsemi but keeped plxtech and added oxsemi in the vendor prefixes.
Note that both of them are now historic, as PLX itself got bought by Avago and they seem to be discontinuing both the PLX and Oxfor brand names.
Yes, it's kind of a mess. The ox820 has been rebranded to plx7821, but not the ox810...
Arnd
Thanks, Neil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html