Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] DT: leds: Add binding for the ISSI IS31FL32xx family of LED drivers
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-02-24 19:49:46
Also in:
linux-leds
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:34 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:04:49 +0100 Jacek Anaszewski [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi David, Thanks for the patch. On 02/23/2016 07:17 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:quoted
From: David Rivshin <redacted> This adds a binding description for the is31fl3236/35/18/16 I2C LED drivers. Signed-off-by: David Rivshin <redacted> --- .../devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-is31fl32xx.txt | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-is31fl32xx.txtdiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-is31fl32xx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-is31fl32xx.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0a05a1d --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-is31fl32xx.txt@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +Binding for ISSI IS31FL32xx LED Drivers + +The IS31FL32xx family of LED drivers are I2C devices with multiple +constant-current channels, each with independent 256-level PWM control. +Each LED is represented as a sub-node of the device. + +Required properties: +- compatible: one of + issi,is31fl3236 + issi,is31fl3235 + issi,is31fl3218 + issi,is31fl3216 +- reg: I2C slave address +- address-cells : must be 1 +- size-cells : must be 0 + +LED sub-node properties: +- reg : LED channel number (1..N) +- max-brightness : (optional) Maximum brightness possible for the LED.Please use led-max-microamp instead. You can refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt for detailed description.FYI, I think I got that property from leds-pwm, since these use PWMs internally, although I don't actually use it myself. I can see how led-max-microamp could be a useful property, however I'm uncertain about computing cdev->max_brightness from it as these devices look to control their max current via an external resistor. I suppose either the resistor value, or the resultant max-current would need to be given in the devicetree, and then that used along with led-max-microamp to compute cdev->max_brightness. Although I'd want it to be optional as I suspect most users don't need any restriction. Also, I don't think I can properly test the result, which always makes me nervous. Would it be acceptable to simply remove the max-brightness property without adding led-max-microamp? It can always be added if a user turns out to need it in the future. Or do you feel strongly that led-max-microamp should be in the binding from the start?
You should put in DT whatever makes sense for the controls the h/w has. If you only have a PWM, then only max-brightness makes sense and led-max-microamp does not. Rob