Hi Javi,

Thanks for review.

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 06:28:57PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:52:09PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:

quoted

With profiling Hi6220's power modeling so get dynamic coefficient and
sustainable power. So pass these parameters from DT.

Now enable power allocator wit only one actor for CPU part, so directly
use cluster0's thermal sensor for monitoring temperature.

Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
index 50ba1b0..3608a3e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 
 #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/clock/hi6220-clock.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
 
 / {
 	compatible = "hisilicon,hi6220";

@@ -87,6 +88,7 @@
 			cooling-max-level = <0>;
 			#cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
 			cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP &CLUSTER_SLEEP>;
+			dynamic-power-coefficient = <311>;
 		};
 
 		cpu1: cpu@1 {

@@ -322,5 +324,39 @@
 			clock-names = "thermal_clk";
 			#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
 		};
+
+		thermal-zones {
+
+			cls0: cls0 {
+				polling-delay = <1000>;
+				polling-delay-passive = <100>;
+				sustainable-power = <3326>;
+
+				/* sensor ID */
+				thermal-sensors = <&tsensor 2>;
+
+				trips {
+					threshold: trip-point@0 {
+						temperature = <65000>;
+						hysteresis = <1000>;

As far as I know, hysteresis is ignored in the thermal subsystem right
now, so you could remove it from both trip points.

Will remove it.

quoted

+						type = "passive";
+					};
+
+					target: trip-point@1 {
+						temperature = <75000>;
+						hysteresis = <1000>;
+						type = "passive";
+					};
+				};
+
+				cooling-maps {
+					map0 {
+						trip = <&target>;
+						contribution = <1024>;

As Hikey has only one voltage domain, you only have one cpu cooling
device.  "contribution" is only useful when you have more than one
cooling device, as it's relative to the other cooling device's
contribution.  You can remove contribution from here.

Other than this minor stuff, it looks good to me. FWIW,

Reviewed-by: Javi Merino <redacted>

Thanks for review. Will sent out new version.

Thanks,
Leo Yan

quoted

+						cooling-device = <&cpu0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
+					};
+				};
+			};
+		};
 	};
 };