Thread (7 messages) flat view 7 messages, 3 authors, 2016-03-02

Re: [lkp] [printk] 34578dc67f: EIP is at vprintk_emit+0x1ea/0x600

From: Sergey Senozhatsky <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-24 12:52:23
Also in: lkml, oe-lkp

Hello,

On (02/24/16 12:46), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
quoted
and you get the NMI watchdog softlockup because you have a whole bunch of

   "of_overlay_destroy: Could not find overlay #6"
   "### dt-test ### of_unittest_destroy_tracked_overlays: overlay destroy failed for #6"

messages to print. seems that somehitng just pushes them in a loop.
there are too many of them:
This sounds like a reasonable explanation. It seems that
of_unittest_destroy_tracked_overlays() really ended in an infinite
loop.

But I am still curious why the softlookup points to

[   33.497718] EIP is at vprintk_emit+0x1ea/0x600

Also there is on the stack

[   33.497741]  [<c068e712>] vprintk_default+0x32/0x40
[   33.497741]  [<c068e712>] vprintk_default+0x32/0x40
[   33.497744]  [<c06fdf6e>] printk+0x11/0x13
[   33.497744]  [<c06fdf6e>] printk+0x11/0x13
[   33.497748]  [<c0df5eec>] of_unittest_overlay+0x8d1/0x900
[   33.497748]  [<c0df5eec>] of_unittest_overlay+0x8d1/0x900
[   33.497750]  [<c0df6b1f>] of_unittest+0xc04/0xc2d
[   33.497750]  [<c0df6b1f>] of_unittest+0xc04/0xc2d

I would expect that the soft lookup happens in console_unlock()
called with IRQs disabled. It seems to me that of_unittest_overlay()
is called with IRQs enabled.
watchdog has two different parts: hrtimer part (via IRQ) checks the
touch_ts and wakeups the updater smpboot kthread; and updater kthread,
that updates touch_ts. to get a lockup you can just keep the preemption
disabled for 20+ seconds, so updater kthread will not update touch_ts.
the next hrtimer irq will detect lockup. and the .config we have is

CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
# CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set

that can add up to the issue.

(well, at least watchdog was working this way the last time I saw it).

I want to be sure that the patch in printk() did not introduce
a deadlock that is visible only under a high printk load.
sure. I did additional intensive tests today, and saw no issues.
schematically, something like this:

	u64 start = local_lock() >> 31UL:

	{ preempt_disable(), local_irq_save() }
	while (1) {
		u64 now = local_clock() >> 31UL;
		if (now - start > TIMEOUT)
			goto out;
		pr_err(">>>>>\n");
	}
out:
	{ preempt_enable(), local_irq_restore() }

I guess that the softlookup was not visible before the
printk patch was applied. I wonder if the patch made something
worse. It was supposed to improve things but...
I think the softlockup under the given conditions (endless printk and
no preemption) will show up regardless the patches being applied; but
I see you point, of course.

	-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help