RE: [RFC PATCH] drivers: ata: Read Rx water mark value from device-tree
From: Anurag Kumar Vulisha <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-22 11:08:04
Also in:
linux-ide, lkml
Hi Arnd,
-----Original Message----- From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd@arndb.de] Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 4:05 AM To: Anurag Kumar Vulisha Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org; pawel.moll@arm.com; mark.rutland@arm.com; ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk; galak@codeaurora.org; tj@kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux- ide@vger.kernel.org; Anirudha Sarangi; Srikanth Vemula; Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri; Anurag Kumar Vulisha Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drivers: ata: Read Rx water mark value from device- tree On Saturday 20 February 2016 18:48:22 Anurag Kumar Vulisha wrote:quoted
index 7ca8b97..7e48dfc 100644--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-ceva.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-ceva.txt@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Required properties: Optional properties: - ceva,broken-gen2: limit to gen1 speed instead of gen2. + - ceva,rx-watermark: RX fifo water mark level for SATA controller. Examples: ahci@fd0c0000 {@@ -17,4 +18,5 @@ Examples: interrupts = <0 133 4>; clocks = <&clkc SATA_CLK_ID>; ceva,broken-gen2; + ceva,rx-watermark = <0x40>; };How would a hardware integrator know which value is right for a particular SoC? Could it be keyed off the hardware ID? Could the bootloader perhaps set an appropriate value in the AHCI_VEND_PTC register at boot time and the driver read the initial value from it? From the description, it sounds like this is a policy decision rather than hardware description, and shouldn't really be in here.
Thanks for reviewing the patch. Can I use module_param() for this watermark instead of reading it from devicetree or doing it in bootloader. In bootloader we are initializing serdes controller for high speed devices. As a part of this initialization we will be reseting all the high speed pheripherals which are using serdes, so SATA will also get resetted. Because of this reason, can I use module_param() for Rxwatermark value instead? Thanks, Anurag Kumar V
Arnd