On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Matthew McClintock
[off-list ref] wrote:

From: Varadarajan Narayanan <redacted>

Add pinctrl driver support for IPQ4019 platform

Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Olivari <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <redacted>
---

I was asked to review this, to make sure that Linus wasn't waiting for
my ack or anything. But now I see that you have not added him as a
recipient. Please make sure to run ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl and
pick appropriate recipients in the future.

v3
- update example with actual values from dts
- add missing pins 71-99
- drop many functions and stick to basic functionality

I hope to see a patch later on adding all those functions back, but
that's fine with me.

[..]

+static struct platform_driver ipq4019_pinctrl_driver = {
+       .driver = {
+               .name = "ipq4019-pinctrl",
+               .owner = THIS_MODULE,

platform_drivers do get their .owner assigned by platform_drive_register().

+               .of_match_table = ipq4019_pinctrl_of_match,
+       },
+       .probe = ipq4019_pinctrl_probe,
+       .remove = msm_pinctrl_remove,
+};

Part of the .owner above you have my
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <redacted>

@Linus, this still applies and builds cleanly on linux-next.
Would you be okay dropping the owner assignment while applying this patch?

Regards,
Bjorn