Re: [PATCH 1/3][v2] net: phy: introduce 1000BASE-KX and 10GBASE-KR
From: Andrew Lunn <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-18 15:15:00
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, netdev
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-01-22 · Re: [PATCH 1/3][v2] net: phy: introduce 1000BASE-KX and 10GBASE-KR · Andrew Lunn <hidden>
- 2016-01-22 · Re: [PATCH 1/3][v2] net: phy: introduce 1000BASE-KX and 10GBASE-KR · Shaohui Xie <hidden>
- 2016-01-22 · Re: [PATCH 1/3][v2] net: phy: introduce 1000BASE-KX and 10GBASE-KR · Shaohui Xie <hidden>
- 2016-01-22 · Re: [PATCH 1/3][v2] net: phy: introduce 1000BASE-KX and 10GBASE-KR · Sebastian Hesselbarth <hidden>
- 2016-01-22 · Re: [PATCH 1/3][v2] net: phy: introduce 1000BASE-KX and 10GBASE-KR · Shaohui Xie <hidden>
[S.H] the fsl backplane, e.g. 10GBASE-KR, needs software to handle link training, It's to train link partner, and trained by link partner parallel. But if media type is not copper, e.g. optical module, we won't need this.
So what we actually need to know is copper vs fibre? Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html