Hi Kalle Valo,

On 01/07/16 11:02, Kalle Valo wrote:

Uri Mashiach [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Device tree modifications:
- Pinmux for SPI0 and WiFi GPIOs.
- SPI0 node with wlcore as a child node.

Cc: Tony Lindgren <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Uri Mashiach <uri.mashiach-UTxiZqZC01RS1MOuV/RT9w@public.gmane.org>
---

Uri, please document the dependencies next time. Thanks!

quoted

v1 -> v2: Replace interrupts and interrupt-parent with interrupts-extended.
v2 -> v3: Move the pinctrl-0 = <&wifi_pins> to the wlcore node.
v3 -> v4: replace interrupts-extended with interrupts and interrupt-parent. (revert v2 modification).
          According to Rob Herring and Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt,
	  interrupts-extended should only be used when a device has multiple interrupt parents.

 arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-cm-t335.dts | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)

To what tree should this patch go? My wireless-drivers-next tree doesn't
even have this file.

Right. It will hit the mainline during this merge window through Tony's and
arm-soc trees.

Do you think it will be sensible if you take 1/3 and 2/3 patches and Tony
will take the 3/3 (there is no code dependency between first two and the last one),
or we can just wait till arm-soc hits the mainline, so you will have the
needed code?

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7933441/

-- 
Regards,
Igor.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html