* Russell King - ARM Linux [off-list ref] [160127 03:19]:

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:02:37AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:

quoted

In my opinion this patch is not support for new hardware. It just add
missing DT definition for one specific board for HW which was added to
linux kernel in v4.2-rc1 version. For me it looks like that needed DT
definition was forgotten...

Opinions differ, but ultimately it's up to whoever is responsible for
accepting the patch, and in the case of ARM SoC based patches, the
arm-soc maintainers.

Yeah. Sorry for long delay as discussed. I'm applying the $subject
patch finally into omap-for-v4.6/dt today.

We still have at least two fixes left to go that both affect also
n900. But at least I can now sanely test adding new stuff with a WIP
fix for the PM runtime regression.

The arm-soc maintainers close their trees for development changes a
few weeks before hand (a patch of mine which was acked etc by 7th
December never made the 4.5 merge window either, and the alleged
reason I've been told is because arm-soc was already closed by then).

Heh I too have some pending clock framework patches from December
that I did not repost yet as the maintainers notified that they
rather not take new stuff any longer for v4.5 before the holidays.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html