Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology
From: Måns Rullgård <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-24 22:39:14
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-ide, linux-serial, linux-spi, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-01-27 · Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
- 2016-01-25 · Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology · Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- 2016-01-25 · Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
- 2016-01-25 · Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology · Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- 2016-01-24 · Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Mark Brown [off-list ref] writes:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 07:21:50PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote:quoted
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> The source and destination masters are reflecting buses or their layers to where the different devices can be connected. The patch changes the master names to reflect which one is related to which independently on the transfer direction.This is patch 3 of a series but I don't have anything else in the series. What is going on with the rest of the series - what are the dependencies and so on?
I give up. Seriously, this is impossible. If I don't include everybody in the slightest way related to any patch in the series, I get complaints that patches are missing. If I do, the lists reject it all due to too many recipients. What the hell am I supposed to do? -- Måns Rullgård