Re: [PATCH v6 6/9] mfd: axp20x: Add support for RSB based AXP223 PMIC
From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-11 12:09:11
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Lee Jones [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:quoted
The AXP223 is a new PMIC commonly paired with Allwinner A23/A33 SoCs. It is functionally identical to AXP221; only the regulator default voltage/status and the external host interface are different. Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <redacted> --- drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 11 +++++++ drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 2 ++ include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 93 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c
[...]
quoted
quoted
+static int axp20x_rsb_probe(struct sunxi_rsb_device *rdev) +{ + struct axp20x_dev *axp20x; + int ret; + + axp20x = devm_kzalloc(&rdev->dev, sizeof(*axp20x), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!axp20x) + return -ENOMEM; + + axp20x->dev = &rdev->dev; + axp20x->irq = rdev->irq; + sunxi_rsb_device_set_drvdata(rdev, axp20x);What's the point of this call? Why do you need a sunxi_ variant?This is an inline call defined in include/linux/sunxi-rsb.h, which is equivalent to dev_set_drvdata(&rdev->dev, data). It seems many subsystems or bus drivers have this pattern. git grep void.*_set_drvdata include/linux/ | wc -l yields 34, not including dev_set_drvdata itself and this sunxi_rsb variant.
That doesn't answer my question. Why is it required? Looks like superfluous churn to me. Aggregation for the sake of it.
quoted
quoted
+ ret = axp20x_match_device(axp20x); + if (ret) + return ret; + + axp20x->regmap = devm_regmap_init_sunxi_rsb(rdev, axp20x->regmap_cfg); + if (IS_ERR(axp20x->regmap)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(axp20x->regmap); + dev_err(&rdev->dev, "regmap init failed: %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + return axp20x_device_probe(axp20x); +} + +static int axp20x_rsb_remove(struct sunxi_rsb_device *rdev) +{ + struct axp20x_dev *axp20x = sunxi_rsb_device_get_drvdata(rdev); + + return axp20x_device_remove(axp20x); +} + +static const struct of_device_id axp20x_rsb_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "x-powers,axp223", .data = (void *)AXP223_ID }, + { }, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, axp20x_rsb_of_match); + +static struct sunxi_rsb_driver axp20x_rsb_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "axp20x-rsb", + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(axp20x_rsb_of_match), + }, + .probe = axp20x_rsb_probe, + .remove = axp20x_rsb_remove, +}; +module_sunxi_rsb_driver(axp20x_rsb_driver); + +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PMIC MFD sunXi RSB driver for AXP20X"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Chen-Yu Tsai [off-list ref]"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c index 54a00168da26..968d77fb95d8 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ static const char * const axp20x_model_names[] = { "AXP202", "AXP209", "AXP221", + "AXP223", "AXP288", };@@ -616,6 +617,7 @@ int axp20x_match_device(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x) axp20x->regmap_irq_chip = &axp20x_regmap_irq_chip; break; case AXP221_ID: + case AXP223_ID: axp20x->nr_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(axp22x_cells); axp20x->cells = axp22x_cells; axp20x->regmap_cfg = &axp22x_regmap_config;diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h b/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h index 00697c6ad8b0..d82e7d51372b 100644 --- a/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h +++ b/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ enum { AXP202_ID, AXP209_ID, AXP221_ID, + AXP223_ID, AXP288_ID, NR_AXP20X_VARIANTS, };
-- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.