Thread (79 messages) 79 messages, 5 authors, 2015-12-03

Re: [PATCH v3 00/27] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC NAND on non-OMAP platforms

From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Date: 2015-12-02 18:43:35
Also in: linux-omap, lkml

Hi Roger,

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 10:42:12AM +0530, Roger Quadros wrote:
On 02/12/15 08:56, Brian Norris wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:41:16PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
quoted
On 30/11/15 21:54, Brian Norris wrote:
quoted
But anyway, I'm not sure that completely answered my question. My
question was whether you were removing the irqchip code solely for
performance reasons, or are there others?
Yes. Only for performance reasons.
Hmm, that's not my favorite answer. I'd prefer that more analysis was
done here before scrapping irqchip...
I agree. We could retain the irqchip model till we have more satisfying
analysis.
I won't insist, though if it's not too ugly/horrible to do so, I think
that would make sense. I'll leave it as your call.

Brian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help