Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Support for Cortex-M Prototyping System
From: Vladimir Murzin <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-25 14:40:00
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arm-kernel, linux-serial, lkml
From: Vladimir Murzin <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-25 14:40:00
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arm-kernel, linux-serial, lkml
On 25/11/15 11:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
I'd be happy to hear any feedback/comments on this series!Looks pretty good overall, I didn't have any specific concerns.
Thanks for your time!
quoted
quoted
Remain questions: - Application notes 399/400 have PSRAM located at address different to what we have for AN385/AN386, so I'm wondering what is the best practice to handle CONFIG_DRAM_BASE? Different defconfig or there is better place?I would not want to add more than one defconfig for a relatively simple platform. Most actual users would have to modify their config anyway, so I think it's best to just have one config file for the most common machine here and let users change the dram base if they have the other one.
I think the same, just wanted to check that I didn't misunderstand something.
We can also look at using the Kconfig fragments infrastructure more here.quoted
quoted
- I'm not sure about naming of dts files: Application Notes (mps2-an*) vs Cortex-M (mps2-cm*); any preference?I don't mind either way.
Ok, I'll leave things as they are till anybody has different opinion on that. Cheers Vladimir
Arnd