Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] spi: introduce mmap read support for spi flash devices
From: Brian Norris <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-11 07:20:49
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, linux-spi, lkml
Hi, On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:20:46PM +0530, R, Vignesh wrote:
On 11/11/2015 4:53 AM, Brian Norris wrote:quoted
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:59:55AM +0530, Vignesh R wrote:quoted
diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h index cce80e6dc7d1..2f2c431b8917 100644Hi --- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h@@ -361,6 +361,11 @@ static inline void spi_unregister_driver(struct spi_driver *sdrv) * @handle_err: the subsystem calls the driver to handle an error that occurs * in the generic implementation of transfer_one_message(). * @unprepare_message: undo any work done by prepare_message(). + * @spi_mtd_mmap_read: some spi-controller hardwares provide memory. + * Flash drivers (like m25p80) can request memory + * mapped read via this method. This interface + * should only be used by mtd flashes and cannot be + * used by other spi devices. * @cs_gpios: Array of GPIOs to use as chip select lines; one per CS * number. Any individual value may be -ENOENT for CS lines that * are not GPIOs (driven by the SPI controller itself).@@ -507,6 +512,11 @@ struct spi_master { struct spi_message *message); int (*unprepare_message)(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_message *message); + int (*spi_mtd_mmap_read)(struct spi_device *spi, + loff_t from, size_t len, + size_t *retlen, u_char *buf, + u8 read_opcode, u8 addr_width, + u8 dummy_bytes);Is this API really sufficient? There are actually quite a few other flash-related parameters that might be relevant to a controller. I presume you happen not hit them because of the particular cases you're using this for right now, but: * How many I/O lines are being used? These can vary depending on the type of flash and the number of I/O lines supported by the controller and connected on the board.This API communicates whatever data is currently communicated via spi_message through spi_sync/transfer_one interfaces.
No it doesn't. A spi_message consists of a list of spi_transfer's, and each spi_transfer has tx_nbits and rx_nbits fields.
quoted
* The previous point can vary across parts of the message. There are various combinations of 1/2/4 lines used for opcode/address/data. We only support a few of those combinations in m25p80 right now, but you're not specifying any of that in this API. I guess you're just making assumptions? (BTW, I think there are others having problems with the difference between different "quad" modes on Micron flash; I haven't sorted through all the discussion there.)How is the spi controller currently being made aware of this via m25p80_read / spi_sync() interface? AFAIK, mode field of spi_device struct tell whether to do normal/dual/quad read but there is no info communicated wrt 1/2/4 opcode/address/data combinations.
Yes there is. m25p80 fills out spi_transfer::rx_nbits. Currently, we only use this for the data portion, but it's possible to support more lines for the address and opcode portions too, using the rx_nbits for the opcode and address spi_transfer struct(s) (currently, m25p80_read() uses 2 spi_transfers per message, where the first one contains opcode + address + dummy on a single line, and the second transfer receives the data on 1, 2, or 4 lines).
And there is no info indicating capabilities of spi-master wrt no of IO lines for opcode/address/data that it can support.
For a true SPI controller, there is no need to specify something
different for opcode/address/data, since all those are treated the same;
they're just bits on 1, 2, or 4 lines. So the SPI_{TX,RX}_{DUAL,QUAD}
mode flags in struct spi_master tell m25p80 all it needs to know.
quoted
There are typically both flash device and SPI controller constraints on this question, so there needs to be some kind of negotiation involved, I expect. Or at least, the SPI master needs to expose which modes it can support with this flash-read API.If spi-master capabilities are known
For generic SPI handling, these are already known. But now you're adding flash-specific capabilities, and I'm not going to assume that all accelerated-read (e.g., your TI mmap'ed flash read) support all the same modes as your generic modes. So, which modes does your mmap'ed read handle? 1/1/1? 1/1/2? 1/1/4? 4/4/4? (where x/y/z means x lines for opcode, y lines for address, and z lines for data)
then spi_mmap_read_supported() (or a new function perhaps) can be used for negotiation. These capabilities can be added incrementally once ability to specify spi-master capabilities are in place.
spi_master capabilities are already in place. So now you need to describe them for your new interface too.
quoted
Also, this API doesn't actually have anything to do with memory mapping. It has to do with the de facto standard flash protocol. So I don't think mmap belongs in the name; it should be something about flash. (I know of at least one other controller that could probably use this API, excpet it doesn't use memory mapping to accomplish the accelerated flash read.)As far as TI QSPI controller is concerned, the accelerated read happens via mmap port whereby a predefined memory address space of SoC is exposed as QSPI mmap region. This region can be accessed like normal RAM(via memcpy()) and the QSPI controller interface takes care of fetching data from flash on SPI bus automatically
I understand all that, but the API as it currently stands is not tied to that implementation at all.
hence, I named it as above. But, I have no hard feelings if it needs to be generalized to spi_mtd_read() or something else.
Maybe spi_flash_read()? It's technically not limited to MTD, though it probably would only be used there. (And please, don't tread on the 'spi_nor_' prefix, as we already have a related, but distinct, framework using that.) Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html