Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 4 authors, 2015-11-19

Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] arm/arm64: add smccc

From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Date: 2015-11-02 13:56:45
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 11:51:19AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Jens,

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:21:23AM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote:
quoted
Adds helpers to do SMC and HVC based on ARM SMC Calling Convention.
CONFIG_HAVE_SMCCC is enabled for architectures that may support
the SMC or HVC instruction. It's the responsibility of the caller
to know if the SMC instruction is supported by the platform.

Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/Kconfig               |  4 ++
 arch/arm/kernel/Makefile       |  2 +
 arch/arm/kernel/smccc-call.S   | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/kernel/smccc.c        | 18 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/Kconfig             |  4 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile     |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S | 43 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/smccc.c      | 18 ++++++++
 include/linux/arm-smccc.h      | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This should probably be split so that the arm and arm64 patches can be
merged separately.
OK, what's preferable two or three patches?
quoted
 9 files changed, 237 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/smccc-call.S
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/smccc.c
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/smccc.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/arm-smccc.h
[...]
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 72ad724..29ab16a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -226,6 +226,9 @@ config NEED_RET_TO_USER
 config ARCH_MTD_XIP
 	bool
 
+config HAVE_SMCCC
+	bool
If you want this to be selectable by multiple arches, wouldn't it be
better to define it out in a common Kconfig file? Maybe HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
too, for some better namespacing.
What's a good place, init/Kconfig?
An alternative is just making your TEE driver depend on ARM || ARM64
and providing dummy smc wrappers that return an error code for cores
older than ARMv7.
It's tempting, but it would mean adding this dummy function for all
architectures as it need to be exported to be usable from a load module.
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9098bd8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2015, Linaro Limited
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License Version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ */
+#include <linux/linkage.h>
+
+#define SMC_RES_X0_OFFS	0
+#define SMC_RES_X2_OFFS	16
These should be generates in asm-offsets.c
OK
quoted
+
+/*
+ * void smccc_smc(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1, unsigned long a2,
+ *		  unsigned long a3, unsigned long a4, unsigned long a5,
+ *		  unsigned long a6, unsigned long a7, struct smccc_res *res)
+ */
+ENTRY(smccc_smc)
+	smc	#0
+	ldr	x4, [sp]
+	stp	x0, x1, [x4, #SMC_RES_X0_OFFS]
+	stp	x2, x3, [x4, #SMC_RES_X2_OFFS]
+	ret
+ENDPROC(smccc_smc)
+
+/*
+ * void smccc_hvc(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1, unsigned long a2,
+ *		  unsigned long a3, unsigned long a4, unsigned long a5,
+ *		  unsigned long a6, unsigned long a7, struct smccc_res *res)
+ */
+ENTRY(smccc_hvc)
+	hvc	#0
+	ldr	x4, [sp]
+	stp	x0, x1, [x4, #SMC_RES_X0_OFFS]
+	stp	x2, x3, [x4, #SMC_RES_X2_OFFS]
+	ret
+ENDPROC(smccc_hvc)
Maybe you could generate both of these from an asm macro that takes the
first instruction as a parameter?
OK
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ed13ba3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2015, Linaro Limited
+ *
+ * This software is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
+ * License version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation, and
+ * may be copied, distributed, and modified under those terms.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ */
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smccc_smc);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smccc_hvc);
Again, I think you want an arm_ prefix for some better namespacing.
Agree
quoted
diff --git a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
[...]
quoted
+#define SMCCC_SMC_32			(0 << 30)
+#define SMCCC_SMC_64			(1 << 30)
+#define SMCCC_FAST_CALL			(1 << 31)
+#define SMCCC_STD_CALL			(0 << 31)
+
+#define SMCCC_OWNER_MASK		0x3F
+#define SMCCC_OWNER_SHIFT		24
+
+#define SMCCC_FUNC_MASK			0xFFFF
+
+#define SMCCC_IS_FAST_CALL(smc_val)	((smc_val) & SMCCC_FAST_CALL)
+#define SMCCC_IS_64(smc_val)		((smc_val) & SMCCC_SMC_64)
+#define SMCCC_FUNC_NUM(smc_val)		((smc_val) & SMCCC_FUNC_MASK)
+#define SMCCC_OWNER_NUM(smc_val) \
+	(((smc_val) >> SMCCC_OWNER_SHIFT) & SMCCC_OWNER_MASK)
+
+#define SMCCC_CALL_VAL(type, calling_convention, owner, func_num) \
+			((type) | (calling_convention) | \
+			(((owner) & SMCCC_OWNER_MASK) << SMCCC_OWNER_SHIFT) | \
+			((func_num) & SMCCC_FUNC_MASK))
+
+#define SMCCC_OWNER_ARCH		0
+#define SMCCC_OWNER_CPU			1
+#define SMCCC_OWNER_SIP			2
+#define SMCCC_OWNER_OEM			3
+#define SMCCC_OWNER_STANDARD		4
+#define SMCCC_OWNER_TRUSTED_APP		48
+#define SMCCC_OWNER_TRUSTED_APP_END	49
+#define SMCCC_OWNER_TRUSTED_OS		50
+#define SMCCC_OWNER_TRUSTED_OS_END	63
+
+/**
+ * struct smccc_res - Result from SMC/HVC call
+ * @a0-a3 result values from registers 0 to 3
+ */
+struct smccc_res {
+	unsigned long a0;
+	unsigned long a1;
+	unsigned long a2;
+	unsigned long a3;
+};
Are there any endianness considerations for this structure?
No, I can't find anything in the ARM SMC Calling Convention document
indicating that.

Thanks,
Jens
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help