On 10/14/2015 06:52 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:

Franklin,

On 14/10/15 14:36, Roger Quadros wrote:

quoted

On 13/10/15 04:38, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:

quoted

Switch from dma_request_channel to allow passing dma channel
information from DT rather than hardcoding a value.

Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <redacted>

Acked-by: Roger Quadros <redacted>

quoted

---
 drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
index d0f2620..957c32f 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c

@@ -1866,7 +1866,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		dma_cap_zero(mask);
 		dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
 		sig = OMAP24XX_DMA_GPMC;
-		info->dma = dma_request_channel(mask, omap_dma_filter_fn, &sig);
+		info->dma = dma_request_slave_channel_compat(mask,
+			omap_dma_filter_fn, &sig, pdev->dev.parent, "rxtx");
+

Just discovered that you are using the parent device node.

How about moving the dma bindings to the nand node instead and using
pdev->dev here?

Roger,

From what I can tell the interrupt number and the dma channel will always be

the same no matter what. Doesn't matter if you have multiple nands or a
combination of nands and nors. Since that is the case I think it just makes
sense to leave it in the gpmc parent node and define it once.

quoted

quoted

 		if (!info->dma) {
 			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "DMA engine request failed\n");
 			err = -ENXIO;

cheers,
-roger