Hi Stephen,

No there is no reason. I will fix it.

Thanks for review.

Best regards

Gabriel

On 6 October 2015 at 20:06, Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:

On 10/05, Gabriel Fernandez wrote:

quoted

@@ -452,7 +651,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops st_pll1200c32_ops = {
 static struct clk * __init clkgen_pll_register(const char *parent_name,
                              struct clkgen_pll_data  *pll_data,
                              void __iomem *reg,
-                             const char *clk_name)
+                             const char *clk_name, spinlock_t *lock)

Is there a reason we pass lock here but never use it in this
function?

quoted

 {
      struct clkgen_pll *pll;
      struct clk *clk;

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html