W dniu 26.09.2015 o 00:54, Andreas Dannenberg pisze:

This patch series extends the driver to also support bq24250/bq24251.

The bq24250/251/257 devices have a very similar feature set and are
virtually identical from a control register point of view so it made
sense to extend the existing driver rather than submitting a new driver.
In addition to the new device support the driver is also extended to
allow access to some device features previously hidden. Basic and
potentially dangerous charger config parameters affecting the actual
charging of the Li-Ion battery are only configurable through firmware
rather than sysfs properties. However some newly introduced properties
are exposed through sysfs properties as access to them may be desired
from userspace. For example, it is now possible to manually configure
the maximum current drawn from the input source to accommodate different
chargers (0.5A, 1.5A, 2.0A and so on) based on system knowledge a
userspace application may have rather than rely on the auto-detection
mechanism that may not work in all possible scenarios.

Note that most patches have dependencies on other patches in the series.

v7:
- Fixed an issue that would have impacted running bisect on the series
  and double checked the entire series builds one by one by running
  a git rebase -i --exec="make ..." ... on the Kernel tree
- Minor simplification of a return from a function

v6:
- Removed the ability to configure the IRQ through "stat-gpios"
- Allow re-configuring the input_current_limit via sysfs also when
  charger auto-detection is enabled
- Use gpiod interface for initialization as a platform device (nice
  GPIO setup simplification)
- Document all newly introduced sysfs nodes
- Streamlined/fixed/simplified charger state handling as it relates
  to battery removal/insertion and the associated handling of the
  input current limit setting
- Minor simplifications/cleanup
- Rebased onto git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sre/linux-
  power-supply.git (branch "next") and completely retested

It would be useful if you would mark which patches have changed. I
reviewed already the first patch but you did not add my reviewed-by tag.
I suppose something changed... but I can't find the exact reason for
missing review.

Best regards,
Krzysztof