Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] fsl: Add binding for RCPM
From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-25 02:43:52
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linuxppc-dev
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2015-10-08 · RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] fsl: Add binding for RCPM · Wang Dongsheng <hidden>
- 2015-10-01 · Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] fsl: Add binding for RCPM · Scott Wood <hidden>
- 2015-10-01 · RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] fsl: Add binding for RCPM · Stuart Yoder <hidden>
- 2015-09-25 · RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] fsl: Add binding for RCPM · Wang Dongsheng <hidden>
- 2015-09-25 · RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] fsl: Add binding for RCPM · Wang Dongsheng <hidden>
On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 21:38 -0500, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote:
quoted
quoted
+* Freescale RCPM Wakeup Source Device Tree Bindings +------------------------------------------- +Required rcpm-wakeup property should be added to a device node if the device +can be used as a wakeup source. + + - rcpm-wakeup: The value of the property consists of cells, the number of + cells defined in "fsl,#rcpm-wakeup-cells". The first cell is a pointer + to the rcpm node, the second cell is the bit mask that should be set + in IPPDEXPCR0, and the third cell is for IPPDEXPCR1, and so on.The phandle should not be included in the cell count.Yes, the first cell "&rcpm" should be in the cell count, right?
No. None of the other #foo-cells work that way. -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html