[PATCH v5 08/23] regulator: core: Drop redundant locking
From: Tomeu Vizoso <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-17 13:03:56
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-arm-kernel, lkml
Subsystem:
the rest, voltage and current regulator framework · Maintainers:
Linus Torvalds, Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown
Now that we use a klist when looking up regulator devices, we can avoid
locking regulator_list_mutex if we take a reference on the regulator
device, if one is found.
This change would be useful if for example regulator devices could be
registered on demand when a driver requests them. regulator_register()
could end up being called from within _regulator_get while the lock on
regulator_list_mutex is being held, causing a deadlock.
This sequence illustrates the situation described above:
tegra_hdmi_probe
_regulator_get
regulator_dev_lookup
of_device_probe
reg_fixed_voltage_probe
regulator_register
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <redacted>
---
Changes in v5:
- Use regulator_class' klist of devices instead of regulator_list to
store and lookup regulator devices.
Changes in v4:
- Take a reference to the regulator's device to prevent dangling
pointers
Changes in v3:
- Avoid unlocking the regulator device's mutex if we don't have a device
Changes in v2:
- Acquire regulator device lock before returning from
regulator_dev_lookup()
drivers/regulator/core.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index b048af9c1ae4..24245c78b58c 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c@@ -1328,7 +1328,7 @@ static void regulator_supply_alias(struct device **dev, const char **supply) static int of_node_match(struct device *dev, const void *data) { - return dev->of_node == data; + return dev->of_node == data && get_device(dev); } static struct regulator_dev *of_find_regulator_by_node(struct device_node *np)
@@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ static int regulator_match(struct device *dev, const void *data) { struct regulator_dev *r = dev_to_rdev(dev); - return strcmp(rdev_get_name(r), data) == 0; + return strcmp(rdev_get_name(r), data) == 0 && get_device(dev); } static struct regulator_dev *regulator_lookup_by_name(const char *name)
@@ -1395,16 +1395,20 @@ static struct regulator_dev *regulator_dev_lookup(struct device *dev, if (r) return r; + mutex_lock(®ulator_list_mutex); list_for_each_entry(map, ®ulator_map_list, list) { /* If the mapping has a device set up it must match */ if (map->dev_name && (!devname || strcmp(map->dev_name, devname))) continue; - if (strcmp(map->supply, supply) == 0) + if (strcmp(map->supply, supply) == 0 && + get_device(&map->regulator->dev)) { + mutex_unlock(®ulator_list_mutex); return map->regulator; + } } - + mutex_unlock(®ulator_list_mutex); return NULL; }
@@ -1435,6 +1439,7 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev) if (!r) { if (have_full_constraints()) { r = dummy_regulator_rdev; + get_device(&r->dev); } else { dev_err(dev, "Failed to resolve %s-supply for %s\n", rdev->supply_name, rdev->desc->name);
@@ -1444,12 +1449,16 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev) /* Recursively resolve the supply of the supply */ ret = regulator_resolve_supply(r); - if (ret < 0) + if (ret < 0) { + put_device(&r->dev); return ret; + } ret = set_supply(rdev, r); - if (ret < 0) + if (ret < 0) { + put_device(&r->dev); return ret; + } /* Cascade always-on state to supply */ if (_regulator_is_enabled(rdev) && rdev->supply) {
@@ -1485,8 +1494,6 @@ static struct regulator *_regulator_get(struct device *dev, const char *id, else ret = -EPROBE_DEFER; - mutex_lock(®ulator_list_mutex); - rdev = regulator_dev_lookup(dev, id, &ret); if (rdev) goto found;
@@ -1498,7 +1505,7 @@ static struct regulator *_regulator_get(struct device *dev, const char *id, * succeed, so, quit with appropriate error value */ if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) - goto out; + return regulator; if (!devname) devname = "deviceless";
@@ -1512,40 +1519,46 @@ static struct regulator *_regulator_get(struct device *dev, const char *id, devname, id); rdev = dummy_regulator_rdev; + get_device(&rdev->dev); goto found; /* Don't log an error when called from regulator_get_optional() */ } else if (!have_full_constraints() || exclusive) { dev_warn(dev, "dummy supplies not allowed\n"); } - mutex_unlock(®ulator_list_mutex); return regulator; found: if (rdev->exclusive) { regulator = ERR_PTR(-EPERM); - goto out; + put_device(&rdev->dev); + return regulator; } if (exclusive && rdev->open_count) { regulator = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY); - goto out; + put_device(&rdev->dev); + return regulator; } ret = regulator_resolve_supply(rdev); if (ret < 0) { regulator = ERR_PTR(ret); - goto out; + put_device(&rdev->dev); + return regulator; } - if (!try_module_get(rdev->owner)) - goto out; + if (!try_module_get(rdev->owner)) { + put_device(&rdev->dev); + return regulator; + } regulator = create_regulator(rdev, dev, id); if (regulator == NULL) { regulator = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + put_device(&rdev->dev); module_put(rdev->owner); - goto out; + return regulator; } rdev->open_count++;
@@ -1559,9 +1572,6 @@ found: rdev->use_count = 0; } -out: - mutex_unlock(®ulator_list_mutex); - return regulator; }
@@ -1659,6 +1669,7 @@ static void _regulator_put(struct regulator *regulator) rdev->open_count--; rdev->exclusive = 0; + put_device(&rdev->dev); mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex); kfree(regulator->supply_name);
--
2.4.3