On 27/08/15 14:51, Fu Wei wrote:

Hi Thomas, Hanjun

On 27 August 2015 at 21:40, Thomas Gleixner [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Hanjun Guo wrote:

quoted

quoted

[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/29/236

If that is ok with you, we will introduce similar DECLARE_ thing
for clock declare.

Yes.

Thanks

quoted

quoted

Or we can drop this patch from this patch set, and clean up this
patch when the ACPI_DECLARE() infrastructure is ready for upstream.

Works either way. I just noticed that hard coded init thing and
decided to rant about it :)

OK, good idea, this patch will be improve by DECLARE_ thing, then upstream.
drop this from this patchset.

Great thanks for your help

You probably want to keep an eye on this:

https://lwn.net/Articles/657238/

which implements the necessary infrastructure. I'd appreciate if you
could give it a go to find out if it works for you.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html