Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: uniphier: add outer cache support and rework SMP operations
From: Olof Johansson <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-25 03:05:48
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
From: Olof Johansson <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-25 03:05:48
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Masahiro Yamada [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Olof, 2015-08-25 6:47 GMT+09:00 Olof Johansson [off-list ref]:quoted
Hi, On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Masahiro Yamada [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
1/3: add outer cache support 2/3: rework SMP operations 3/3: add device tree nodesTiming of this is unfortunate, please resend after 4.3-rc1 is out and we can queue it up.Given that rc8 is out and the merge window has been delayed, is it still too late for 4.3-rc1?
Yes.
quoted
quoted
Because 2/3 highly depends on 1/3, I hope whole of this series is applied to ARM-SOC tree.Review or acked-by from Russell would be appreciated in that case.quoted
Olof, From this series, I am using "ARM: uniphier:" rather than "ARM: UniPhier:" for the subject prefixes because I noticed you often rephased so when you applied my patches. Are sub-arch names in lower cases preferable in subject prefixes?If you look at "git log --no-merges --oneline arch/arm/mach-*" you'll see that most platforms use either all-caps or all-lowercase.I see. But, we use "UniPhier" (with only U and P capitalized) in our official documents.
That's OK, others surely capitalize their platform names too in documentation. Some of them even have funkier capitalization than that, such as "SPEAr". -Olof