Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] mtd: ofpart: move ofpart partitions to a dedicated dt node
From: Michal Suchanek <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-31 22:33:15
Also in:
lkml
On 31 July 2015 at 19:24, Boris Brezillon [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:52:01 +0200 Michal Suchanek [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
(*pparts)[i].offset = of_read_number(reg, a_cells); (*pparts)[i].size = of_read_number(reg + a_cells, s_cells);@@ -92,15 +116,15 @@ static int parse_ofpart_partitions(struct mtd_info *master, i++; } - if (!i) { - of_node_put(pp); - pr_err("No valid partition found on %s\n", node->full_name); - kfree(*pparts); - *pparts = NULL; - return -EINVAL; - } -Are you sure you can safely remove this check?Yes. It was incomplete check to reject some partitioning schemes considered invalid. Now there is stricter checking above so this can be removed.Indeed, I was worried about resources deallocation, but this is handle by the caller, and if nr_parts is zero the master MTD device will be exposed.
Due to compatibility with the previous scheme there is still possibility that partitions are allocated, and no partitions are returned due to the nr_parts--; So yes, the pparts could possibly leak in this case if there were more partition parsers following ofpart and should be deallocated. Thanks Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html