Thread (10 messages) read the whole thread 10 messages, 2 authors, 2015-07-31

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] mtd: ofpart: move ofpart partitions to a dedicated dt node

From: Michal Suchanek <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-31 22:33:15
Also in: lkml

On 31 July 2015 at 19:24, Boris Brezillon
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:52:01 +0200
Michal Suchanek [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted
quoted
quoted
              (*pparts)[i].offset = of_read_number(reg, a_cells);
              (*pparts)[i].size = of_read_number(reg + a_cells, s_cells);
@@ -92,15 +116,15 @@ static int parse_ofpart_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
              i++;
      }

-     if (!i) {
-             of_node_put(pp);
-             pr_err("No valid partition found on %s\n", node->full_name);
-             kfree(*pparts);
-             *pparts = NULL;
-             return -EINVAL;
-     }
-
Are you sure you can safely remove this check?
Yes. It was incomplete check to reject some partitioning schemes
considered invalid.

Now there is stricter checking above so this can be removed.
Indeed, I was worried about resources deallocation, but this is handle
by the caller, and if nr_parts is zero the master MTD device will
be exposed.
Due to compatibility with the previous scheme there is still
possibility that partitions are allocated, and no partitions are
returned due to the nr_parts--;

So yes, the pparts could possibly leak in this case if there were more
partition parsers following ofpart and should be deallocated.

Thanks

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help